LIGHTS
To
begin, I’d say that this piece is an example of the poetic mode. I say this for a few reasons. There is no traditional narration or any sort
of narrative device. Anything the piece
says is said through either its choice in music, its editing or its
juxtaposition of images. There’s not a
person telling you or guiding you how to feel, but simply images for you to
look at for your consideration and for you to form an opinion about.
There
were also very even cuts to accompany the rhythm of the music, which is highly
conformant to form rather than function.
Style is obviously important in this piece, maybe even more so than
conveying any sort of message.
No
on-set sound was used, continuity wasn’t an issue, and it was exploring a topic
that was somewhat abstract. All of these
things combined make for a poetic documentary piece.
I
would say that “Rain” and “Berlin: Symphony of a Great City” were the two
biggest influences here. “Rain” was a
big influence because it showed me how to investigate a subject without
worrying about a narrative thread necessarily, but still be able to say
something. If it weren’t for “Rain”, I
likely wouldn’t have had the idea to start with small lights and get bigger and
bigger, eventually revealing the most impressive lights of all: other
people. Likewise, “Berlin: Symphony of a
Great City” taught me how enthralling footage of a city can be and that tribute
can be paid just by paying attention to certain things. New York is obviously an impressive city, and
merely showing that is a commentary on its grand stature.
I
felt that using the poetic mode here was the best way to both show the
impressive nature of New York and also comment that as amazing as it is, people
are what makes the world so amazing, not necessarily the edifices the
construct. Without saying a single word,
I was able to explore these ideas possibly more deeply than I would have with
commentary, making the poetic mode an ideal choice for this type of
documentary.
No comments:
Post a Comment